Blog: It's Time For the LAUSD to Create a Trade-Tech Diploma

Our community still needs plumbers, mechanics, construction workers, masons and electricians.

In recent years the Los Angeles Unified School District has focused its curriculum almost entirely on preparing students for college. While attempting to prepare every student for college is certainly an admirable and understandable goal, it is not a realistic one. First of all, not every student wants to go to college. Secondly, a college-bound curriculum is not well-suited for some students. This situation has resulted in numerous students leaving the LAUSD (some graduating and some not) without the skills necessary to find good jobs in our community.

In recent years career and technical training has been eliminated from our public schools. Our schools no longer teach students the trades. The wood-shop and machine-shop classes that were offered when I was in school are no longer offered.

The elimination of career and technical training and trade classes has resulted in many students being left behind. This is harmful to our community in numerous ways.  We no longer have high school graduates that are ready to begin a career in welding, masonry, metal work, plumbing, the hospitality industry, or in countless other important trades. These are important jobs, good-paying jobs, and jobs that cannot be shipped overseas.  Yet our public school district has eliminated classes that train students for these careers that enable them to enter the workplace with a good job upon graduation.

There is another serious problem that has developed since career and technical classes have been eliminated—more students drop out of school. Career and technical training and trade classes are classes that some students will excel in, and offering those classes will give those students a reason to stay in school and graduate.  By not offering career and technical classes, students interested in numerous trade-tech careers are being told that they don't matter—that they are not important—that if they are not "college bound" they are not a good "fit" for the LAUSD. We are sending the wrong message to these students. Our schools belong to our community. And as a community we are harming their chances of being productive members of society as adults.

I believe the LAUSD should should reinstate career and technical training and trade classes, including wood-shop, machine-shop, graphic design, drafting, and construction-related classes. I believe the LAUSD should also create a trade-tech diploma so students that choose a path other than college have an additional reason to stay in school, to work hard, and to graduate with a diploma that will help them get a job in a field that interests them and in which they have been trained.

Students that decide to seek a trade-tech diploma would have the choice to elect the trade-tech route after the 10th grade.

There are many ways that the LAUSD can cover the costs of the trade-tech curriculum. It is very likely that the trade-tech curriculum would be cost/revenue neutral because many students that seek the trade-tech route will be spending more time on campus and in class which will increase the amount of "ADA" (Average Daily Attendance) funds received by their school.

Furthermore, additional revenue covering the cost of the trade-tech curriculum would be created through internship opportunities with the private business sector. Students could participate in work-study programs where a company pays into a program that enables students to spend time working for the company to gain on-the-job experience. Obviously, students that do a good job as an intern through such a work-study program would have a leg-up in getting a full-time job after graduation with the company the student interned for.

There may also be opportunities for state, federal, and private grants as a result of such a new job-placement program within the LAUSD.

Finally, a quote from Michael Theriault, writing for the San Francisco Building and Construction Trades Council, in an article titled, "The Return of Shop to City Schools," sums up the academic benefits of a trade-tech curriculum:

"[Shop] acquaints students with its ties to mathematics and the sciences. It could point toward possibilities in the arts, which arise in one degree or another from craftsmanship. Through discussions of its materials—wood, metal, rubber, plastic—it could point toward history classes, and through the materials those classes could draw the student into study of the Industrial Revolution, colonialism, conquest of native peoples, systems of government, and on and on. The shop class could even give practical lessons in English; imagine, for example, an exercise in which a student is handed an incomplete specification for some required task and to complete it is made to write an RFI. On finishing the shop class a student should have some idea of how to answer the question, ‘What use is x in my life?’—and we could substitute for x any of the litany of usually detested classes."

As mayor, I will be a strong advocate for education reform with both the LAUSD and in Sacramento. You can read more about my education platform here, including my creation of an Education Information Officer within the mayor's office and an education liaison who will serve as an education advisor within the mayor's office.

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Jo November 29, 2012 at 06:37 AM
This is why we all must vote for Kevin James for Mayor. Kevin James is the ONLY outsider. All the others participated in the biggest giveaway to the public unions that are bankrupting our city with their extremely lavish pensions and retiree benefits. We will be the highest taxed city in the nation at 9.75% sales tax if the idiots in this city vote yes for yet another tax increase. Thousands Oaks's sales tax will be almost 2 percent less. Vote all the insider retreads OUT. Our city is heading for bankruptcy and we need a common sense mayor after all these years of wife cheating, incompetent Mayor Villar.
Alex November 29, 2012 at 04:08 PM
I agree completely. Even though I hated those classes when in school, I found again and again that understanding basic principles of woodshop and metalwork, and how to use different tools and for what makes me a good handy husband. And again, every time I buy a furniture from IKEA or Walmart, and seeing my high school 15yrs old son being unable to follow simple directions and assemble it.... Well, I bet there must be a required class for that, rather than for gay history.
Robert D. Skeels November 30, 2012 at 08:16 AM
Although Mr. James and I are on opposite sides of the political spectrum, I agree that the elimination of vocational and trade-tech education in our district has been an abject disaster. We need to empower students to pursue their passions, not limit them with narrow curricula, and one-size-fits-all expectations. While I oppose the rest of Mr. James' education agenda, which is hopelessly right-wing and reactionary, I do agree strongly with him on this. As a candidate for the LAUSD School Board, let me go on record as saying I want to restore vocational and trade-tech education choices for students wanting careers in line with their interests and passions.
Dodd Harris December 04, 2012 at 06:53 PM
Completely agree! We have seen the results of the unrealistic "self-esteem" movement: You can't tell a student that their talents lie elsewhere, you can't recommend anything but matriculation to a 4 year college, anything practical or blue-collar is considered an institutional failure. Here is what I know: Take a "C" student high school graduate who knows how to be a plumber and he will EARN at least $200,000 in the four years (or more realistically 5 years) while his counterpart in college will SPEND $100,000 (plus several years of under-employment) add in Pell grants and lost income taxes that the trade school grad will be paying and I would venture to say that society would probably see a net gain of at least $200,000 for every average student that they train in a trade, versus a college degree.
nonoise December 09, 2012 at 04:13 PM
Yes!! Someone that understands a broken system and how to fix it. Kevin James for mayor!


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »