Blog: LAX—Modernization vs. Expansion

Expanding one runway at LAX before we modernize its broken, out-of-date terminals and build a rail line to the airport is a bad investment. More runway space won't matter if passengers can't use it.

As LAWA prepares to release their long-awaited plans to expand LAX, my neighborhood, Westchester, cowers in fear and anticipation. Previous expansion efforts have disrupted lives, destroyed businesses, and generally incited an atmosphere rife with anxiety because any movement of the north runway (as proposed) will alter the fabric of our community.

That said, LAX is an embarrassment. Most of its terminals are woefully inadequate, out of date, and frankly, falling apart. We don’t even have mass transit serving the airport, removing any credibility in calling LAX a 21st century airport.

So, I am all for some big changes to LAX, but I—like my neighbors—fear that LAWA’s plans to create a 21st century airport will be rooted in a 20th-century approach: expansion and the tired idea that “bigger is better”.

Here’s the problem. Expand the runway north before you modernize the existing infrastructure and you build something that can’t be used effectively. Until we create an efficient, user-friendly passenger experience, it won’t matter how many planes we can park on the bigger runway. They’ll just sit there.

Don’t get me wrong; this is a huge opportunity here. LAWA wants to spend some real money on this project and if we approach this with a little intelligence, LA will have a world-class airport and will get a much-needed investment into the local economy, but we have to be smart about it.

But expansion first is not the smartest move. Yes, an expansion would create 1,000s of temporary jobs in construction but at the cost of a huge swath of Westchester’s permanent business district. In essence, we’ll trade permanency for temporary.

I propose we focus entirely on modernizing existing infrastructure first. It preserves the Westchester business district and corresponding tax base while creating a New Deal-style project for our nascent tech industry in Venice to grow around. That would take what is now a group of pioneering tech start-ups up into the next level: a real and permanent industry within Los Angeles that is vibrant and evolving to create new jobs and serve Los Angeles through its work.

And while we do that, expand the green into LAX and there are your construction jobs. Let’s not approach this challenge from the perspective of conventional wisdom. Instead, let’s band together and build a newer, better LAX that serves its community and becomes something we can be proud of.

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Stephen Manning July 27, 2012 at 06:00 PM
Definitely a quality thought, by expanding the north runway and allowing A380's to land without having to closing taxiways, delays and congestion might be avoided, but then what would happen to the traffic close to and in the terminals. Perhaps simply moving a runway is easier than completely overhauling and expanding the outdated domestic terminals. In any cases, both improvements need to be made at some point, which should be the priority is an interesting question indeed.
Odysseus Bostick July 27, 2012 at 06:20 PM
Good contribution, Stephen. My thinking is that these issues need prioritization. LAX is in desperate need of a technological makeover and access to a rail line. Expansion before modernization is a bad investment.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »